Fix for issue 328: @Delegate on a field for which we also generate a getter will use the getter for delegation

This commit is contained in:
Roel Spilker committed 2012-01-24 02:52:13 +01:00
1 parent 3e7bb145d3
commit 2242de2bf9
8 files changed
+149 -4

No files matched your search

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
class DelegateOnGetter {
private final java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicReference<java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicReference<Bar>> bar = new java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicReference<java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicReference<Bar>>();
private interface Bar {
void setList(java.util.ArrayList<java.lang.String> list);
int getInt();
}
@java.lang.SuppressWarnings("all")
public Bar getBar() {
java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicReference<Bar> value = this.bar.get();
if (value == null) {
synchronized (this.bar) {
value = this.bar.get();
if (value == null) {
value = new java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicReference<Bar>(new Bar(){
public void setList(java.util.ArrayList<String> list) {
}
public int getInt() {
return 42;
}
});
this.bar.set(value);
}
}
}
return value.get();
}
@java.lang.SuppressWarnings("all")
public void setList(final java.util.ArrayList<java.lang.String> list) {
this.getBar().setList(list);
}
@java.lang.SuppressWarnings("all")
public int getInt() {
return this.getBar().getInt();
}
}