[PR #3807] Suggestions applied: Remove hopeful note that didn't pan out, removed JDK7 examples (too old to bother listing at this point).

website/templates/features/experimental/onX.html

@@ -11,8 +11,6 @@
 		<ul>
 			<li>
 				Ugly syntax. The syntax of this feature is not optimal, but it is the least convoluted syntax that could possibly work (for now!)
-			</li><li>
-				Possibly java 9 will offer (much) better ways of supporting this feature.
 			</li><li>
 				Uncertainty: Future versions of javac may break this feature, and we may not be able to restore it.
 			</li>

website/usageExamples/experimental/onXExample_pre.jpage

@@ -7,12 +7,9 @@ import javax.persistence.Id;
 import javax.persistence.Column;
 import javax.validation.constraints.Max;
 
-// @AllArgsConstructor(onConstructor=@__(@Inject)) //JDK7
-@AllArgsConstructor(onConstructor_=@Inject) //JDK8
+@AllArgsConstructor(onConstructor_=@Inject)
 public class OnXExample {
-//	@Getter(onMethod=@__({@Id, @Column(name="unique-id")})) //JDK7
-//	@Setter(onParam=@__(@Max(10000))) //JDK7
-	@Getter(onMethod_={@Id, @Column(name="unique-id")}) //JDK8
-	@Setter(onParam_=@Max(10000)) //JDK8
+	@Getter(onMethod_={@Id, @Column(name="unique-id")})
+	@Setter(onParam_=@Max(10000))
 	private long unid;
 }