Added tests to make sure issue 385 is not caused by a simple bug regarding enums

test/transform/resource/after-delombok/GetterEnum.java

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+enum GetterEnum {
+	ONE(1, "One");
+	private final int id;
+	private final String name;
+	@java.lang.SuppressWarnings("all")
+	private GetterEnum(final int id, final String name) {
+		this.id = id;
+		this.name = name;
+	}
+	@java.lang.SuppressWarnings("all")
+	public int getId() {
+		return this.id;
+	}
+	@java.lang.SuppressWarnings("all")
+	public String getName() {
+		return this.name;
+	}
+}

test/transform/resource/after-ecj/GetterEnum.java

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+import lombok.AccessLevel;
+import lombok.Getter;
+import lombok.RequiredArgsConstructor;
+@RequiredArgsConstructor(access = AccessLevel.PRIVATE) enum GetterEnum {
+  ONE(1, "One"),
+  private final @Getter int id;
+  private final @Getter String name;
+  <clinit>() {
+  }
+  private @java.lang.SuppressWarnings("all") GetterEnum(final int id, final String name) {
+    super();
+    this.id = id;
+    this.name = name;
+  }
+  public @java.lang.SuppressWarnings("all") int getId() {
+    return this.id;
+  }
+  public @java.lang.SuppressWarnings("all") String getName() {
+    return this.name;
+  }
+}

test/transform/resource/before/GetterEnum.java

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+import lombok.AccessLevel;
+import lombok.Getter;
+import lombok.RequiredArgsConstructor;
+
+@RequiredArgsConstructor(access=AccessLevel.PRIVATE)
+enum GetterEnum {
+	ONE(1, "One")
+	;
+	@Getter private final int id;
+	@Getter private final String name;
+}